We now know what animal testing is, how it affects us and the animals, and what we can do to stop it. Visual An in vitro human skin equivalent was created to directly mimic all the characteristics of human skin. In recent years, there has been much research and discussion over the use of standardized testing in college admissions.
We can also join organizations against the cruelty of animals such as PETA, in an effort to exploit the companies that do test on animals. For the most part, standardized tests are graded by machines so grader moods and biases will not affect test scores.
If we know the right steps to take, we can all help to put an end to animal testing once and for all. For the most part, standardized tests hinder any sort of creative or out-of-the-box thinking, which is a skill needed in college and in the workforce. Only time will tell what the future holds for standardized testing in college admissions.
Standardized testing is practical. Alternatives to Animal Testing: Standardized testing prepares the student for college. Standardized testing impedes the assessment of a very important skill.
With grade inflation on the rise in many school systems, standardized tests offer a way to consistently compare student knowledge and aptitude. The tests have explicit directions and are easy to administer. Standardized testing shows bias towards women and groups of ethnic and socioeconomic diversity.
Standardized testing offsets grade inflation. Animal Testing is a cruel, unnecessary act that negatively affects both animals and humans.
Standardized testing is biased against certain groups. Compared to more involved assessments, standardized tests are unbiased. Retrieved October 20,from http: By learning all about the cruelties of animal testing, it is time for us to make a change and to put a stop to it once and for all! Arguments Against Standardized Testing Critics of standardized testing in college admissions say that standardized tests are no longer as good of an indicator of college success as once thought.
The debate about standardized testing in college admissions is still ongoing, but here are some arguments for and against these tests. All of the side effects of animal testing are negative to them, and include conditions such as Illness, skin irritation, pain, genetic mutation, and almost always result in death.
In reality, most of the results coming from animal testing do not correlate with human beings reactions. We can also invest in cruelty free companies stocks, bonds, and mutual funds.
The animals come from many places such as zoos, compounds, and breeders. Next, we will visit the effects that animal testing has on both animals and humans.
Or, Alternatives to the Use of Animals in Research. Human skin equivalent as an alternative to animal testing. Standardized testing adds too much stress to student lives. Lastly, we can write to our representatives in congress, asking them to reconsider the ethics of animal testing, and help to put an end to it once and for all.
In regards to an income bias, wealthy students become more prepared for standardized tests through better life experiences, such as top-quality schools and test prep tutors.
Finally, we will learn how to help put an end to the detrimental process of animal testing. The following are just a few arguments against standardized testing.
Standardized testing is objective. February 3, email print Standardized college admissions tests have been around since the early s. Visual Now that we know how cruel and unnecessary animal testing is, we can take steps to putting it to an end.
They are also time efficient and easy to grade. Arguments For Standardized Testing Advocates of standardized testing in college admissions say that the SAT and ACT serve as national, standardized scales to determine how prepared students are for college.
Because of new information this research has introduced, some schools no longer require students to submit SAT and ACT scores but instead offer a test-optional policy. One of the things we can do to stop animal testing, is buy cruelty-free products.
Chocolate, which is very safe in humans, is not safe in dogs. Cruelty free companies are businesses that do not support animal suffering.Transcript of Persuasive Speech Standardized testing is not the way to evaluate students!
ESPECIALLY SAT FOR COLLEGE ADMISSION - More money equals higher scores. My persuasive speech will be on the topic of Animal Testing. Animal testing is the testing and experimentation of products on animals to test the safety levels and reactions.
I chose to select this topic, because it really bothers me that animal testing is still allowed today. Persuasive Speech Against Animal Testing Essay; Persuasive Speech Against Animal Testing Essay.
Words Nov 6th, 8 Pages. Topic: Animal Testing Purpose: To persuade my audience that animal testing is wrong and unethical Animal Testing. Persuasive Speech Outline Essay Words | 5 Pages. Persuasive Speech Against Animal Testing Essay Words | 8 Pages Topic: Animal Testing Purpose: To persuade my audience that animal testing is wrong and unethical Relevance: animals are people too and no one wants an animal to suffer for the wrong reasons Intro Imagene being taken to a place where you are locked up, with barely.
Persuasive Speech Against Animal Testing Essay examples Topic: Animal Testing Purpose: To persuade my audience that animal testing is wrong and unethical Relevance: animals are people too and no one wants an animal to suffer for the wrong reasons Intro Imagene being taken to a place where you are locked up, with barely any room for.
Persuasive Speech Against Animal Testing Essay examples; Related Documents: Persuasive Speech Against Animal Testing Essay examples Against Animal Testing Humans guarantee each other many rights including happiness, dignity, health care, employment, voting, and free speech.Download